>>> Μην με παρεξηγήσετε >>> αλλά ο τρόπος παρουσίασης από τα ΜΜΕ >>> του πολέμου στην Ουκρανία και των επιπτώσεών του >>> θυμίζει τηλεοπτική εκπομπή, με τοποθέτηση προϊόντος >>> και το προϊόν είναι το αμερικανικό LNG >>> το "καλό", το ακριβό, το αμερικάνικο LNG....
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Παρασκευή 19 Απριλίου 2013
Italy: Lost in stagnation
By Guy Dinmore
The ruined city of
L’Aquila epitomises the despair of a nation paralysed by political and economic
torpor
Silence hangs over the
ruins of L’Aquila when 83-year-old Aldo Di Bitonto returns to inspect his
shattered home. It is the fourth anniversary of the earthquake that devastated
the city and he does not know when or even if he will cross the threshold of his
home again.
Reconstruction has all
but ground to a halt, through
lack of money and paralysing politics that have
made medieval L’Aquila the ultimate symbol of Italy’s great stagnation.
“We are in the hands
of incompetent, arrogant and conceited politicians who count for nothing. The
right speaks badly of the left, the left of the right and we the people are
caught in the middle like pressed fish,” laments Mr Di Bitonto, captain of the
city’s football team half a century ago, strolling through the deserted “red
zone” of the historic centre. Steel girders prop up teetering buildings and
churches, and some streets are still entirely closed off.
Candles and fresh
flowers mark the places where 309 people were killed as they slept in L’Aquila
and nearby villages in the early hours of April 6, 2009. Some 22,000 left
homeless are still in “temporary” accommodation.
Massimo Cialente,
L’Aquila’s despairing mayor, is threatening to haul down the national flag from
the city hall and dismiss the prefect representing the central government. “You
can let us die in peace,” he says. “This city has been condemned to death
without resources.”
Despite an outpouring
of grief and hand-wringing pledges by national leaders, L’Aquila has become a
monument to Italy’s economic and political paralysis. Small construction
companies won tenders to rebuild, started work and then went bankrupt when the
state failed to pay them – a pattern that is repeated across the country where
the public administration owes €100bn in arrears to the private sector.
But, like the rest of
Italy, L’Aquila is rich in suffocating bureaucratic impositions. Gian Antonio
Stella, a reporter known for exposing the waste and corruption of the elite
known as the “caste”, counts 1,109 laws, directives and ordinances passed to
deal with the city’s revival. Some aim to prevent the Mafia – one branch of the
Italian economy that is flourishing amid crisis – from taking the spoils of
reconstruction.
Families are still
lodged in a police barracks outside the city that were used to host the 2009 G8
summit after Silvio Berlusconi, then prime minister, shifted the venue to
L’Aquila, ostensibly to draw attention to its plight. The summit budget, Mr
Stella notes, included €26,000 for 60 limited edition pens and €22,500 for 45
silver Bulgari ashtrays.
Beyond L’Aquila,
Italy’s crisis is deepening as the economy enters its eighth consecutive
quarter of contraction, the longest recession since the war. In the decade to
the end of 2012, the eurozone’s third-largest economy recorded 15 quarters of
decline.
An array of statistics
attest to Italy’s slide during that period. In education, Italy has slipped
down the table so that only Greece spends less. Prisoners do even worse than
students, with 140 crammed into communal cells built for 100, the most
overcrowded in Europe. Packed even more solidly are commuters on trains, among
the slowest on the continent. Opening a business? According to the World Bank,
it costs far more to start a business in Italy than in France, Germany or the
UK.
What meagre growth has
been eked out over the past decade – dominated by Mr Berlusconi’s two centre-right
governments – has been largely driven by an influx of immigrants compensating
for Italy’s own declining population. But even they are starting to leave,
joining an exodus of tens of thousands of young Italians, many of whom now
serve in the bars, banks and businesses of London. The Goethe Institute is
overbooked with would-be students of German heading for Berlin.
These days, the front
pages of Il Sole 24 Ore, Italy’s main business daily, are a tombstone to
failure. Last Wednesday it recorded that 4,218 companies had gone bankrupt in
the first three months of the year, up 13 per cent from the first quarter of
2012. Families, too, are being impoverished, their purchasing power falling
nearly 5 per cent last year, returning to levels last seen in the 1990s.
The sense of
entrenched stagnation is mirrored in political paralysis. Eight weeks after
elections resulted in a divided parliament, Italy is still waiting for a new
government as politicians bicker over who should run it.
“We cannot waste time
any more. Time is over,” declared Giorgio Squinzi, head of the Confindustria
business lobby, warning that failure to agree on a government and going back to
the polls within months could condemn Italy to missing out on the economic
recovery projected for the rest of Europe.
Gian Maria Fara,
sociologist and president of the Eurispes think-tank, dates the start of
Italy’s long stagnation to the fall of what is known as the “first republic” in
1992, when the postwar establishment collapsed under the twin pressures of
corruption scandals and the end of the cold war that spelt the demise of
western Europe’s largest communist party.
“The political
leadership was exhausted. The country was suffering. We dismantled a system
that we thought we could rebuild in a few years but it took much longer,” says
Mr Fara. “This is not a political crisis in essence. It is a crisis of the
country’s political and business and academic leadership in general, of which
the politicians are an expression.”
Dominated by a handful
of big corporations with their own “protectionist” instincts at heart and by
politicians who use their parties as vehicles for their own careers, Mr Fara
says Italy is left without a project or a vision and the “logic of small towns,
where everyone just thinks about their own garden”. “We are a country destined
for stalemate. We are a Gulliver, a big body tied down by thousands of ropes
held by the Lilliputians. A huge bureaucracy is holding us down,” he says.
. . .
The stunning success
of the anti-establishment Five Star Movement in the February elections, coming
from nowhere to capture a quarter of the vote and become the third-largest
force in parliament, is a reaction to what Mr Fara calls Italy’s “sickness”.
But under the idiosyncratic leadership of Beppe Grillo, a former stand-up comic
and the country’s most popular blogger, the movement appears to be losing its
way, unable to hew a clear identity out of its heterogeneous mix of idealists,
rightwing extremists and leftwing activists.
Investors hope that
the Five Star Movement will inject a sense of urgency into the mainstream
parties to implement political and economic reforms, as well as jolt Europe
into loosening the grip of austerity that Mario Monti, the caretaker prime
minister, admits has plunged Italy deeper into recession.
But neither Italy’s
political elite nor Brussels’ show much sign of responding. However, the fear
of markets – that Mr Grillo will win a rerun of elections and embark on a
programme of reneging on Italy’s debt and holding a referendum on leaving the
euro – also appears unlikely to materialise.
What the elections did
demonstrate, however, is that Italy’s move towards a bipolar party system has
failed and that an anxious and mobile electorate is looking for change. Perhaps
Matteo Renzi, the youthful and reformist rising star of the centre left, can
harness that restless energy, or the 76-year-old Mr Berlusconi, a billionaire
media mogul, will finally find an heir for the centre-right. But for the moment
fresh elections – early July or October are the dates most mentioned – could
lead to a similar stalemate.
Looking at the bald
numbers and grim political outlook, economists are increasingly doubtful that
Italy will succeed – without a bailout or restructuring – in meeting its
payment obligations on €2tn of public debt, which Mr Monti’s exhausted
technocrat government projects will rise to 130.4 per cent of gross domestic
product this year from a record 127 per cent in 2012. Mr Monti, whose newly
formed centrist alliance took only 8 per cent in the February polls, told
parliament he could not wait to leave office.
“Can Italy survive?
Probably not,” says Pepper Culpepper, professor of political science at the
European University Institute in Florence. “The state is paralysed and
political parties are in free fall. No political system even under
international pressure is capable of changing things.”
“It is hard to think
of anywhere as uncompetitive as Italy. No one is allowed to compete here.
Berlusconi and his friends as well as the unions all fight against reforms,
defending entrenched interests,” says David Levine, professor of economics at
EUI, suggesting that Italy should restructure its debt sooner rather than
later.
. . .
Mr Fara at Eurispes
begs to differ, arguing that the official statistics do not tell the whole
story.
Italy, he says,
survives because it has three GDPs: the “official” GDP of €1.54tn but also the
“hidden” GDP of the black economy that adds another 30-35 per cent and then the
“criminal” GDP of the various mafia organisations he estimates at more than
€200bn.
“There is a lot more
wealth than described in statistics. So, despite all the problems, the country
goes on. Why have the people not stormed parliament with their pitchforks?
Because they have the hidden economy,” he explains. “These two other GDPs are our
social shock absorbers of the crisis.”
But the wealth that
Italians have accumulated, rather than investing, over generations – which
makes them among the richest in Europe in terms of mostly property-based assets
– is dwindling. The country is also in the process of what Eurispes calls the
big “sell-off”, as its most famous brands and companies, particularly in food
and luxury, fall into the hands of foreign buyers.
The list is long,
including power company Edison founded in 1884 (French), Roma football club
(American), Buitoni pasta (Swiss), Peroni beer (South African), Ducati
motorbikes and Lamborghini cars (German), Ferretti luxury yachts (Chinese) and
Valentino fashion (Qatari).
Rumblings of
discontent, among voters and business leaders, are not new. But now even the
military is starting to speak out. Admiral Luigi Binelli Mantelli, chief of the
defence forces, last month took the extraordinary step of publicly slamming Mr
Monti’s government for sending two Italian marines back to India for trial on charges
of killing two Indian fishermen while protecting an Italian tanker on
anti-piracy duty. The case, said the admiral, “is looking always more like a
farce”. In private, officers said his comments reflected a broader view that
the pillars of the state were crumbling.
Not that this means
Italy risks a military coup, even if many Italians yearn for the emergence of a
strongman to lead the country out of crisis. “Italy is caught in a vicious
circle. Political dysfunctionality, a grinding recession, a lack of bank credit
and deep social malaise are all feeding off each other,” comments Nicholas
Spiro, a sovereign risk analyst who closely follows the country. “Italy’s
political, economic and institutional crisis not only endures, but is going
from bad to worse.”
Emigration: A Roman
regrets his return
Millions of Italians
have emigrated in search of a better life since the founding of their modern
state in 1861. First they filled transatlantic liners, taking their cheap
labour and their cardboard suitcases, but more recently they exported their
brainpower carrying laptops.
One Italian who
decided to return to Rome after spending years in France is Massimiliano
Fuksas, an architect. With his interior-designer wife, Doriana, he has
established one of the country’s most successful brands. “It has been a 20-year
nightmare,” he says of his time back in Italy.
Mr Fuksas, 69, is
still involved in various French projects and, with President François
Hollande, has just inaugurated the National Archives he designed in Paris. In
July he will see the opening of Shenzhen’s giant airport in southern China,
which he designed, and he has won a competition for Moscow’s Polytechnic Museum
and Educational Centre.
“France gave me the
possibility to do experimental projects, with new materials. I love France,” he
says. “France is a country with laws. The government is a state. It takes care
of you. At dinner no one speaks of money or politics and never about sex.”
But his best-known
project in Italy, a convention centre in Rome known as The Nuvola (Cloud), has
been dogged by funding problems and is four years overdue.
The executive in
charge has been arrested on corruption charges related to a separate contract.
“In Italy we have a
huge bureaucracy but no state, an administration of nothing,” he says. “In
Italy you start a project without money. In France politicians say you have to
do this and the bureaucracy organises with public and private money and then
there is the tender and building. A linear process. But here it is not like
this.”
“What is our democracy
in Italy, that the richest man wins elections?” asks Mr Fuksas, who does not
hide his disdain for Silvio Berlusconi, billionaire leader of the centre-right
since 1994. Mr Fuksas threatened to leave Italy again if Mr Berlusconi won the
February elections.
Εγγραφή σε:
Σχόλια ανάρτησης (Atom)
0 Σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σχόλια και παρατηρήσεις